you
what is carbon vote basically it is a
gauge for human consensus it collects
information and opinions from the
community for usually for blockchain Bay
blockchain governance related issues we
are I decentralize the team from the
Chinese community I am from a stone
ledger which is a consortium
implementation of etherium that connects
to end compatible to Chinese legal
system so we have a booth outside so if
you interested enough to learn more come
to us and other teams member from
Constance labs grip tape and eth fans so
I think we have all our members here
today so guys if you are here would you
please stand up and say hello to
everybody
daniel from consent celeb did most of
the heavy lift hee hee buttes the web
sites within like a three days so yeah
Thank You Daniel so as a stone ledger at
the carbon vote we we believe in people
we think machine service human and
carbon / silicon that's why we are
called a carbon vote not a second vote
so human comes first right we are based
on what we are based on we are based on
carbon and machines computers are based
on silicon's so our goal is to reach
consensus from the mayor from the
community you know you know fishing in a
efficient way so when it comes to
consensus we think there are two layers
of it the underneath layer is the
Machine consensus and the upper layer is
human consensus the machine Leah refers
to consensus mechanisms like proof of
work and approve estate why are human
consensus is more closely related to
block chain governance and offering it
comes with the soft box and hard Fox we
firmly believe that machine consensus is
just a tool for human consensus its main
purpose is to foster late for the human
consensus so that's what we did
so what we did with the carbon vote
against many of you have seen this photo
here you're in the debate of the door
hardwar had a hard work we did a poor
from a community to measure whether the
community wants to want a hard or
not so basically there are two addresses
one is a yes address and the other is no
address if we want to vote for years you
simply send a zero if the transaction to
the yes address and all you're either in
your local account would be casted to
the yes voting by doing so we lured both
technical Barry and the mental Barry
because here you you do not need to send
users out and you're either is not
locked locked in any means so in the end
we got about five a five percent of
total is a voted and the 80s of
eighty-seven percent of them voted for
yes so what we learned we found that
consensus enforcement is very hard in
the real world decisions are enforced by
violence wiring our word grip toward
everybody is free to choose and what
prochain to live on right I do believe
we have a better world but
we gotta split with a coexistence of et
Cie right the space is in terms of price
talents and resources if you look at the
price of ET cie it's a has it has been
hovering around the 10 to you know ten
to twenty percent of e th and it it's a
pretty consistent with the with the
voting result about future plans we
think they are something suitable to
vote and the other are not community
wisest taking effect issues are probably
worth a voting yes or no to
controversial hard Fox and so Fox and
fundamental overhauls like POS and other
wild wider affect issues like whether or
not to charge a rent for for smart
contract instead of a charge for a big
chunk of a fee in the beginning and let
the small country live forever
there's something that we think are not
suitable to for voting something too
technical and something no not essential
enough to you know to what our time so
to wrap up blockchain governance is
really hard and the voting results are
not likely impossible even with the
super majority support so in that tense
deal with caution and that's all I want
to say and a lot of our I will look
forward to see you on peluche and make
up and vote make your voice heard thank
you