okay we're going to continue the
previous topic about the environmental
risk damages and climate change but from
a bit different approach and I thanks to
my colleagues that were speaking before
us we can you know bypass the first
slides but the difference of the
approach is that we consider the
environmental damages including climate
change as a as in fact a damage which is
caused by human economic activity in a
general sense so more specifically every
deal transaction or contract has its
collateral damage and when you buy a gas
or air ticket your air travel it is
there is a collateral damage to the
environment to human health related to
it and in fact in the nearest years it
has already become a business custom to
assess the damage related to any sort of
economic activity transaction deals in
terms of carbon dioxide equivalent it is
a very convenient thing to you know to
evaluate environmental damage because it
it reflects not only requirement change
damage but also a combustion of fossil
fuels out air pollution energy
efficiency and
that's why it's not only important but
very convenient thing to quantify the
environmental damage for example a few
years ago there was a notorious study
evaluating the damage related to indoor
cannabis production in in the United
States and the damage is as you can see
the energy expenditures equal to five
billion dollars one percent of
electricity consumed in the US and one
kilogram of indoor cannabis production
equals to four point six tonnes of co2
and the recommendation was to you know
to legalize marijuana because outdoor
production would eliminate the need for
indoor production so that's the the
basic scheme that we're talking about
there are three principle participants
of the of the model the seller the buyer
of goods and services and there is
enough you know mitigation outs of
mitigation outcome provider and the
mitigation should be equal or greater
than the collateral damage produced by
the deal between buyer the seller and
once these three participants agree on
the amount of damage and on the price
for mitigation outcome then in the ideal
world you know they the problem would be
settled and solved but in real world
it's far more complicated because
there's all there should be someone who
evaluates assess what the collateral
damages and there always is a person or
an entity who wants to be in charge and
tell the buyer the seller and offset
provider what should be set over
shouldn't be settled what how they the
damage should be
assess and everything there there is a
regulator who wants to be in charge and
that's why you know the although this
market for mitigation for example of
climate change damages is is tremendous
and it's you know at maturity it will be
at least ten trillion dollars and but it
is fragmented into pieces and numerous
barriers prevent from you know
fungibility of the instruments there are
dozens of climate mitigation programs
and and new programs appear and units
and instruments carbon units and I guess
that one of the example was a previous
presentation that a new very interesting
program and the new carbon unit is
proposed but basically they all operate
with one in the same unit one in the
same acid one ton of carbon dioxide
emissions were one ton of carbon dioxide
reduction absorption they are not
integrated and the regulator's really
you know choose and select who can
assess the who can assess the damage who
can participate and the on the market
and our initial target wasn't still is
to to provide an opportunity to overcome
the barriers external barriers between
those dozens of markets and systems and
registries and to internal barriers
which do not let anyone who would want
to participate really participate in it
so that's why we've created a platform
that allows anyone or any existing or
new mitigation program to launch its
program
blockchain and - you know cooperate
integrate to the extent they want they
might be fully independent or they want
or they would want to merge the markets
or they would want to have a you know
unified talking a unit but any of those
dozens of markets carbon programs or
instruments carbon compliance units may
enter this this blockchain and anyone
can actually right now go and launch his
own mitigation problem so what we have
achieved for the moment we have you know
issued transferred the units from a
conventional registry to the blockchain
and performed pilot transactions and we
have also performed a issues of
environmental units of carbon credits by
passing a conventional registry directed
to blockchain which is not easy because
in a real world well you still have to
you know to have a very reliable auditor
in our case it was KPMG to verify sure
that those reductions are real and
comply with the rules so actually right
now you can enter the the decentralized
application to trade or to retire to to
offset the carbon footprint or launch
your own problem in fact as you know
cryptocurrencies also have quite a
significant carbon footprint and for
example the Bitcoin network related the
carbon emissions are equal to those of
emissions of Cyprus and aetherium
Network are smaller emissions are
smaller but still they equal to the
no emissions of Moldova so it's pretty
easy to imagine that there is a there
might be a talking proposed to offset
the exact amount of emissions related to
one VidCon or to one easier we have a
very vast you know development plans and
developing the smart contracts and and
everything but for the moment we might
say that the the proposal of a high
quality assured environmental units is
already provided at the platform now
that we are working on the on the demand
as I've described you know the problem
is related with regulator registries
opposition to a new technology that
would basically deprive the regulators
of much of their authority and would
probably kill the traditional registries
so that doesn't go easy and a very one
very important thing is to you know in
the strategic perspective to eliminate
the need for really physical auditor
verifiers participating in this process
and substituting it by Internet of
Things algorithms plus a validation by
the network and from this point I
probably like Sergey to take over
today my name is surgeon Shaka fine
research team leader at arrow up and our
hit scepter in eyepiece I project my
part of presentation will be about how
we can prepare Mars for Def Con 15 is
you know Mars two days and not the good
ways for humans it's a very cold place
and atmosphere is not friendly for our
brass and if we resolve issue with
logistics with space 6 or other space
program next question will be can we
make Mars a little bit comfortable for
the confusing and it's will be surprise
for you but Paris climate agreement can
help us because if you try find some
abstract or executive summary about
Paris climate agreement you will find
main tasks of Paris climate agreement
main task is keeping a global
temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius
and its mean the Paris climate agreement
is the first planetary terraforming
experiment based on economical game my
main work is research capability of
using human to machine systems and last
three years we working on robot
economics concept we want to build first
planetary spine chain with direct
economical communication between humans
and Nations
but Paris agreement today is not human
to machine system it's a human to human
system with strong reputation
requirements and this requirements for
me is ridiculous because we cannot do in
planetary experiment with this
requirement but if we shift Paris
climate agreement on 0 Network Paris
climate agreement
can be human to machine system and look
at the screen I will try to explain how
it can be work we have manufacturers
around the world who want to be involved
in Paris climate agreement at the same
time we build smart cities around the
world and this smart cities have many
types of different sensors which can
collect data about carbon footprint
around manufacturers smart cities can
send a no reports to serum network we
can install additional package on a
serial network validators additional
package with carbon credit emission
algorithm and after that is zero Network
and issue carbon credits green humans
can buy this credit and our collected
funds can be spread between green
economy manufacturers smart cities who
collect data and serial network
validators who involved in this process
and if it will be work we just can't
change the reforming task from Paris
climate agreement to prepare Mars to
DEFCON filled with the same scheme is
the same software so today we have a
smart contract package for carbon credit
market tested with real participants we
build the sterilizer application for
human to human communication and my team
error team now try to build first carbon
footprint sensors network visually
serial network validators base it on our
air distributive in the next year we
will show first algorithm for carbon
credit issues based on a serial network
and we want to build your service for
reducing
your carbon footprint only with carbon
credit based on a serial network here
you can find more information about
project and if you interesting in error
distributes if you can find more
information error dot life website so
keep on the way to DEFCON on Mars and we
will try to prepare and do it much more
comfortable thank you
[Applause]
[Music]